Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Catapult
From: John Betts <johnb @ aztec . co . za>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 14:30:14 +0200 (SAT)
To: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <m0ujuud-0004jVC @ lina> from "Bernd Eckenfels" at Jul 26, 96 11:59:11 pm
Reply-to: johnb @ aztec . co . za

% Hmm... on the Client side this is true. But we are talking about firewalls.
% One can't use Microsofts Catapult as a firewall for Unix Systems running
% Socks Clients, since the Firewall doesnt understand the Protokoll. With
% Socks you can use a Unix-FW to proxy MS Clients and you can use Unix-Clients
% also.
% 
Are you saying that if I have a network with Unix boxes that I want
to give access to the Internet behind a firewall....

Catapult will not be an option?

tia

ciao

--
John

--
John Betts, Aztec Internet Services Port Elizabeth, South Africa
johnb @
 aztec .
 co .
 za,  Tel. +27(0)41 303 475, Fax. +27(0)41 301 052
Authorised Caldera Consultant     ||     Part of the UUNet Group
The world is complex.  The Sendmail configuration reflects this.


Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Catapult
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)

References:
  • Re: Catapult
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: proxying characteristics of smtp
From: harker @ harker . com (Robert Harker)
Next: RE: proxying characteristics of smtp
From: Mike Dilworth <mjd @ soi . city . ac . uk>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Catapult
From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Next: Re: Catapult
From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com