Firewalls: Re: Tacacs vs. Radius

Firewalls
(August 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Tacacs vs. Radius
From:	"Jim Thompson" <jim @ SmallWorks . COM>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:52:30 -0500
To:	Barbara Jaarsma <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com>
Cc:	Chris Cole <chris @ polymer . uakron . edu>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Barbara Jaarsma <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com> "Re: Tacacs vs. Radius" (Aug 23, 11:32am)
References:	<Pine . LNX . 3 . 94 . 960808203120 . 19020A-100000 @ hobbes . polymer . uakron . edu> <321DC097 . 5136 @ us . checkpoint . com> <9608231014 . ZM781 @ butthead . smallworks . com> <321DF92A . 667F @ us . checkpoint . com>

On Aug 23, 11:32am, Barbara Jaarsma wrote:
> Subject: Re: Tacacs vs. Radius
> Ah, true - but the source is available for Radius.  I wasn't aware that
> it is for tacacs+.  Is it?
> -Barb
>
>-- End of excerpt from Barbara Jaarsma

If by source you are referring to the 'freeware' server that Cisco
supplies, yes, it is.

Jim

References:

Tacacs vs. Radius
From: Chris Cole <chris @ polymer . uakron . edu>
Re: Tacacs vs. Radius
From: Barbara Jaarsma <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com>
Re: Tacacs vs. Radius
From: Barbara Jaarsma <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: DNS lookups to internal node From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: recommedations -- secure access over internet From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Tacacs vs. Radius From: Barbara Jaarsma <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Thanks From: potlicker @ morebbs . com