Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re:authentication
From: potlicker @ morebbs . com
Organization: MORE BBS
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 96 15:19:00
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

Russ, you are missing something  -  but  - it was not explicitly stated
in the orginal posting.   The access to the BigCo network is, er was, 
already there.

Two Windows NT servers in the basement control a small printing press.  Both
NT machines have dial-up lines and guest accounts.   They were originally
stand alone machine not connected to the corporate network.   Someone wanted 
to read e-mail and plugged them into the LAN.   Subsequently a war dialler
found the two NT machines and guests arrived.   The guests had sufficient
knowledge to steal a copy of the entire cc:Mail post office and crack
the Admin password in a machine offsite.   Don't panic.   We told BigCo.
we saw a problem.  After the first "That's impossible" they checked.   Then
they unplugged the Windows NT servers from their LAN.

It was this background that prompted me to ask about adding something to a
firewall that would provide authentication services.  Not all their users
use cc:Mail.  Some use Unix mail and some use pop3.  The common point of
interconnection is the inside of the firwall.
                                                   PoT_LiCkEr

-=      Electronic Shrine of Our Lady of the Immaculate Packet      =-
-=    Church of the Dead Meow & First Church of the Gooey Death     =-

Indexed By Date Previous: FW-1 v2.1 and HP-UX
From: security @ qualix . com (Nik I. Knoth)
Next: RE: Catapult as a Bastion Host in a Screened Subnet Firewall setup?
From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Authentication
From: Bill Husler <Bill @ Husler . xo . com>
Next: Re:authentication
From: potlicker @ morebbs . com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com