Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: authenticated/encrypted sessions
From: Jim Wamsley 303-673-8163 <jim @ coltano . stortek . com>
Organization: Storage Technology Corporation
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 07:28:42 -0600 (MDT)
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, raf @ ezunx . com

WARNING

BLATANT CDOMMERCIALISM TO FOLLOW


Network Systems Corporation, a division of StorageTek, has two
products to allow exactly what you are asking to do.  The Borderguard
and the Security Router.  Each has a capability known as network control
facility.  these devices can either be your firewall or set directly 
behind your firewall, and establish authenticated encrypted sleeves 
across the Internet to a like device on the far side.  Various encryption 
algorithms are available.  look at the web site

http://www.network.com/SecurityProducts.html

 ______________________________________________________________
[ Jim Wamsley, Network Engineering                             ]
[ StorageTek 2270 S. 88th St, M.S. 4379, Louisville, CO 80028  ] 
[ Audible:  (303) 673-8163    Logical jim_wamsley @
 stortek .
 com  ]
[                   Everything to Excess!                      ]
[  To enjoy life to the fullest, you must take big bites.      ]
[                  Moderation is for monks.                    ]
[                                                Lazarus Long  ]
[______________________________________________________________]


 > From firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM Thu Sep  5 21:30 MDT 1996
 > Date: Thu,  5 Sep 96 18:44:22 PST
 > From: rich <raf @
 ezunx .
 com>
 > Subject: authenticated/encrypted sessions
 > To: firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
 > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
 > Mime-Version: 1.0
 > 
 > Hi,
 > 
 >    This should be a simple one (yeah right) that should generate lots
 > of responses (I hope).
 > 
 >    I want to set up authenticated and encrypted tunnels through a 
 > firewall.  the rub, NO COMMERCIAL products allowed.  My thoughts --
 > socks5 since I have to handle windows 3.1, win 95 and winNT apps
 > as well as Unix.
 > 
 > So, Comments?  Suggestions? Strange Sounds?
 > 
 > AD<thanks>VANCE,
 > rich
 > 
 >                              o' |,=./ `o
 >                                 (o o)    
 >                        -----ooO--(_)--Ooo-------
 > 
 > ** Remember -- If you can keep your head when all others around
 >                you are losing theirs...
 > 
 > You're probably not paying attention!
 > 

Indexed By Date Previous: Building a monitoring system
From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
Next: Re: authenticated/encrypted sessions
From: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: authenticated/encrypted sessions
From: Chris Garrigues <cwg @ DeepEddy . Com>
Next: Re: authenticated/encrypted sessions
From: Jüri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com