Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: firewall-1 delay is tolerable ?
From: Robert Hanson <roberth @ cet . com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: Kim <cgkim @ kotel . co . kr>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199609060759 . RAA18104 @ rara . kotel . co . kr>

ethernet switch?

you can get a good one from smc for less than a thou

--->
Robert H. Hanson           LAN/WAN Consultant - Internet Service Provider
Otis Orchards, Wa.         Cutting Edge Communications        www.cet.com
(509) 927-9541             finger: info @
 cet .
 com or email: roberth @
 cet .
 com



On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Kim wrote:

> I am using FW-1 2.0 on sparc 1000 with 2 cpu.
> Ping and traceroute passing firewall through indicate the delay on there
> is great and such delay is very clear by compairing it with pings in outside 
> router.
> Also the system collision indicator shows excessive ,I think, collision status.
> Do you have any nice improvements about this ?
> - Kim.
> 



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: C2 certified OS that can run a firewall
From: mcnabb @ argus . cu-online . com (Paul McNabb)
Next: FW: C2 Myths
From: "william.wells" <william . wells @ damark . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: firewall-1 delay is tolerable ?
From: Kim <cgkim @ kotel . co . kr>
Next: Re: firewall-1 delay is tolerable ?
From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com