Firewalls: Re: smap alternative?

Firewalls
(September 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: smap alternative?
From:	"Frederik H. Andersen" <fha @ dde . dk>
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 1996 17:19:06 +0200
To:	lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Cc:	firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	lists's message of Thu, 12 Sep 1996 15:20:41 +0200. <m0v1BhC-0004k6C @ lina>

lists @
 lina .
 inka .
 de said:
>  I won't recommend running qmail on a firewall (although I would feel 
> much safer than with smapd), but I certainly recommend using qmail on 
> a DMZ host for receiving internet mail.

How do you make this evaluation?  What are you criteria?  (No criticism
intended, pure interest 8-)

/Frederik

Follow-Ups:

Re: smap alternative?
From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)

References:

Re: smap alternative?
From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Firewall 1 - Problems with redirects... From: Pam Perdue <SOPERDP @ so . cc . va . us>
Indexed By Date	Next:	"Cooltalk" / "Netmeeting" concerns? From: "Kenneth W. Betcher" <kbetcher @ City . Winnipeg . MB . CA>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: smap alternative? From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: smap alternative? From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)