Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: FW-1 - less secure ?
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 18:29:39 +1000 (EST)
To: klynn @ cyberspace . com (DOA)
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine . SUN . 3 . 95 . 960928180347 . 2553B-100000 @ case . cyberspace . com> from "DOA" at Sep 28, 96 06:08:20 pm

> In my experience I'd favor gauntlet as it is a true application level
> proxy gateway. Firewall-1 which is supposed to perform as the fastest
> firewall around is unfortunately a hybrid packet filtering firewall
> therefore it is somewhat less secure (depending on how you setup your
> site of course).

Interestingly, I heard some gossip recently that Checkpoint (& Sun)
weren't sure if Firewall-1 (or any firewall with FW-1 installed) could
"Fail safe".

Darren


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: authentication w/CERN or other proxy
From: Natchu Vishnu Priya <vishnu @ cs . iitm . ernet . in>
Next: Re: FW-1 - less secure ?
From: "Gerard D. Cochrane Jr." <gdcochra @ utep . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: SOLARIS x86 as firewall platform
From: DOA <klynn @ cyberspace . com>
Next: Re: FW-1 - less secure ?
From: "Gerard D. Cochrane Jr." <gdcochra @ utep . edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com