Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: FW-1 - less secure ?
From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:39:22 -0400
To: "Gerard D. Cochrane Jr." <gdcochra @ utep . edu>
Cc: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>, DOA <klynn @ cyberspace . com>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

Will someone please slap this child?

At 03:02 AM 9/29/96 -0600, Gerard D. Cochrane Jr. wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Darren Reed wrote:
>
>> > In my experience I'd favor gauntlet as it is a true application level
>> > proxy gateway. Firewall-1 which is supposed to perform as the fastest
>> > firewall around is unfortunately a hybrid packet filtering firewall
>> > therefore it is somewhat less secure (depending on how you setup your
>> > site of course).
>> 
>> Interestingly, I heard some gossip recently that Checkpoint (& Sun)
>> weren't sure if Firewall-1 (or any firewall with FW-1 installed) could
>> "Fail safe".
>> 
>> Darren
>> 
>	Fuck you dildo you wanna see a REALLY secure system.. try to hack
>MINE.. IM UNHACKABLE.. you stupid panzys cant do shit stupid bastards..
>Lick my balls.. you little BOYS.. lick em'... go away idiots.. your all to
>stupid for me to be asociating myself with.
>
>


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Accidental Social Engineering Security Attack
From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Next: Re: FW-1 - less secure ?
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Accidental Social Engineering Security Attack
From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Next: New Release - Software OTP Encryption.
From: nobody @ REPLAY . COM (Anonymous)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com