Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:29:49 -0400
To: "Charles_Ragan @ ins . com" <Charles_Ragan @ INS . COM>
Cc: "Harry Feltsadas" <harry @ ns . fdc . nl>, jfjohnm @ ca-online . com (John McColley @ J F Engineering), firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

Also, it goes without saying that classful routing protocols have outlived
their usefulness, and should be abandoned at one's earliest convenience.

In fact, RIPv1 has been declared historical (or, rather, hysterical).

- paul

At 08:53 PM 9/30/96 -0500, Charles_Ragan @
 ins .
 com wrote:

>One other note, rfc 1878's recommendation allows for the usage of the first
>and last subnet.  Routing protocols that carry subnet information in its
>updates allow for this. Ones that don't (igrp, static, ripv1, etc.).  The
>practice I follow is to use them last, if needed.
>
>Charles
>

--
Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
Reston, Virginia   USA                                 ||||      ||||
tel: +1.703.716.9538                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso @
 cisco .
 com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s


Indexed By Date Previous: RE: NT Security
From: "Bruce M." <bkmarsh @ feist . com>
Next: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Greg Ketell <gketell @ cisco . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Next: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Greg Ketell <gketell @ cisco . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com