Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Darryl Wagoner <darryl @ sai . com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 07:05:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kim Sung Ro <ksr @ 164 . 124 . 1 . 108>
Cc: Harry Feltsadas <harry @ ns . fdc . nl>, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <3250A81A . 58E8 @ 164 . 124 . 1 . 108>

On Tue, 1 Oct 1996, Kim Sung Ro wrote:

> Harry Feltsadas wrote:
> > 
> 
> 
> In http://cio.cisco.com/warp/public/701/3.html,  All 0's or 1's in
> network part can't be used.
> So if you subnet C class with 255.255.255.192, the number of effective
> network is 2 I think.
> In default network, We can't use 0 and 255 number as network number.
> For example for A class, the first byte of IP address can't be 0 or 255.
> So if you subnet C class with 255.255.255.192 (use 2 bits), 00 and 11
> can't be used for subnetting bits.

That is the way that I understood it myself, but I have seen provides
use all the networks.  It really surprised me.
--
Darryl Wagoner		darryl @
 sai .
 com   http://www.sai.com/
Office: 603.672.0736   		Fax: 603-672-4846
Beware of self-styled experts: an ex is a has-been, and a spurt is a
drip under pressure.



Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Next: FTP and TELNET Authenticati
From: "Jerry Edmiston" <jle9 @ eci-esyst . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Next: Re: Subnetting Class C Network
From: jegan @ iai . com (James P. Egan)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com