Firewalls: Re: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder

Firewalls
(October 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder
From:	Jim Richey <jrichey @ pabs . com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Oct 1996 09:18:29 -0400
To:	barbara @ us . checkpoint . com
Cc:	Firewall Discussion <Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>
References:	<325149EB @ MSSMTPOUT . COMM . HQ . AF . MIL> <32514C1F . 1BD3 @ us . checkpoint . com>

What do you base this on? We are currently running Sidewinder and are
pleased with its operation. Are there advantages to running FireWall-1
as opposed to Sidewinder?

Barbara W. Jaarsma wrote:
> 
> Bouchard, Alexis, 2Lt,SAM/GNCP wrote:
> >
> > I have to choose between Gauntlet and Sidewinder as a Firewall solution.
> 
> Personally, I'd go with FireWall-1...  :-)
> -Barb

-- 

Jim Richey
jrichey @
 pabs .
 com
http://www.cmagic.com/Pub/JLR/home.html

References:

Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder
From: "Bouchard, Alexis, 2Lt,SAM/GNCP" <BOUCHARDA @ comm . hq . af . mil>
Re: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder
From: "Barbara W. Jaarsma" <barbara @ us . checkpoint . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Gauntlet 3.1 on SGI IRIX and SecurID From: cgt @ ecmwf . int (Tony Bakker)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Opinions/Experiences re: Sidewinder? From: "Rob M. VanHooren" <rob @ linkd . net>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder From: Arley Carter <ac @ twinds . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder From: bjm @ ottawa . net (Brian McIntosh)