Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: NT Security
From: "Davidson, Clyde" <CDAVIDSO @ IS . NMH . NMH . ORG>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 17:22:00 -0500
To: Firewalls <Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

<Replying to several messages>

Don't forget that the "Orange Book" that defines C2 is not for any   
networked system. It defines government security requirements for   
stand-alone systems. That means that any UNIX system that is networked   
would loose whatever C2 certification that it might have, just like NT.

Also remember that C2 is Discretionary Access Control. That means that   
"The discretionary access control mechanism shall, either by explicit   
user action or by default, provide that objects are protected from   
unauthorized access. These access controls shall be capable of including   
or excluding access to the granularity of a single user." The Orange   
Book. It looks to me that NT and any C2 UNIX both do this just fine. Of   
course, being discretionary means that NT and UNIX can be configured   
without any security at all. That is the requirement. If you want   
Mandatory Access Control you will have to make your system B1, B2, B3, or   
A1 level of security. However, you still can't network it.

Then again, none of this discusses whether these are even worthwhile for   
commercial businesses.

Clyde Davidson

 ----------


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: NT Security
From: Keith McCammon <keithm @ asymetrix . com>
Next: RE: Gauntlet vs. Sidewinder
From: "Davidson, Clyde" <CDAVIDSO @ IS . NMH . NMH . ORG>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: NT Security
From: Keith McCammon <keithm @ asymetrix . com>
Next: RE: NT Security
From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com