Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Remote admin. on FW's
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 07:38:54 -0600 (CST)
To: sazah @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Sunny Azah)
Cc: genel @ inforamp . net, genelee @ vnet . ibm . com, kmeade @ tcd . ie, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199611042142 . NAA07133 @ vegas . ibu . sj . nec . com> from "Sunny Azah" at Nov 4, 96 01:42:42 pm

> > 5) How secure is the remote management client? X11 attacks on a remote
> >    management GUI will defeat the strongest encryption.

> Good point.  Howevever, the problem encompasses more than
> just X Windows security, but the total security of the administrative
> machine.

Or if it's a Windows or NT box, there's virus based attacks, attacks on any
local webserver, attacks through the registry, and so on. Your admin box
needs to be as secure as your firewall.



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: re: NCSA
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
Next: RFC: Post.Office as sendmail replacement
From: "Fletcher B. Cocquyt" <fletch @ ttf . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Remote admin. on FW's
From: sazah @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Sunny Azah)
Next: Re[2]: Kerberos
From: footes @ ov . com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com