Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: firewall-1's problem
From: Tony Iannotti <tony @ fozzie . secapl . com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 17:44:41 -0500 (EST)
To: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . com
In-reply-to: <Pine . GSO . 3 . 95 . 961108173231 . 4214A-100000 @ clark . net>

On Fri, 8 Nov 1996, Paul D. Robertson wrote:

> You've _always_ been able to set packet size on *nix, by placing a
> packetsize after the host, and before the optional count.  The only
> difference is that Unix hosts have been limiting the ICMP datagram size,
> and NT/95 apparently allow impossible sizes.

Gotcha. I think there is actually a limit on NT/95 also, but it's so close
to the danger limit that the additional length provided by headers goes
over.



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: firewall-1's problem
From: Jesse Whyte <jesse @ psa . pencom . com>
Next: Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #608
From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: firewall-1's problem
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Next: Re: firewall-1's problem
From: Jesse Whyte <jesse @ psa . pencom . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com