Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: ssh licensing
From: Doug Hughes <doug @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 10:33:43 -0600 (CST)
To: Kent Crispin <kent @ songbird . com>
Cc: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ eng . auburn . edu>, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199611090541 . VAA29590 @ songbird . com>

On Fri, 8 Nov 1996, Kent Crispin wrote:

Yes, you are entirely right. I had 'thought' however, that we were only
talking about the windows version in that context.. I should have been
more clear..

> Doug Hughes allegedly said:
> > 
> 
> > >SSH licence says: Companies are permitted to use this program as long as
> > >it is not used for revenue-generating purposes.=20
> > >
> > >As I understand you can use it freely inside your company without paying
> > >anything.=20
> > >
> > 
> > yes, for the currently available alpha and beta versions. However, once it
> > goes out of beta, I'm fairly certain you are no longer allowed to use it
> > freely anymore but must purchase an individual, site, or other kind of
> > license to use.
> 
> Not the way I understand it.  The unix version of ssh is freely 
> usable, modulo the crypto patents, and Tatu Ylonen, the author, has 
> publicly stated that he intends to always keep a free version 
> available.  So the issue is just the crypto licenses, not any 
> licenses that are particular to ssh.
> 
> In 4 years the RSA patents run out.  Ssh supports about 5 different
> encryption algorithms, so you can probably find one that is freely
> usable in your location. 
> 
> The windows versions are being developed as a commercial product, and 
> there are (or will be) commercial unix versions.  If you buy a 
> commercial version, then the licensing issues are resolved -- when 
> you buy the product, part of what you are paying for is rights to the 
> crypto algorithms.
> 
> Ssh is based on a protocol that has been submitted as a public standard 
> to the IETF, so there is nothing to prevent other implementations 
> from being developed.
> 
> -- 
> Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
> kent @
 songbird .
 com,kc @
 llnl .
 gov		the thief he kindly spoke...
> PGP fingerprint:   B6 04 CC 30 9E DE CD FE  6A 04 90 BB 26 77 4A 5E
> 

____________________________________________________________________________
Doug Hughes					Engineering Network Services
System/Net Admin  				Auburn University
			doug @
 eng .
 auburn .
 edu



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Security Risks with Real Audio?
From: Michael Richardson <mcr @ sandelman . ottawa . on . ca>
Next: virus detection sw on U**X (BSD) needed
From: Zoltan Kinczli <Zoltan . KINCZLI @ Optotrans . HU>
Indexed By Thread Previous: ssh licensing
From: Kent Crispin <kent @ songbird . com>
Next: Re: ssh licensing
From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com