Simple question :)
Is it possible to shut off the vty in the Cisco so that it can only be
accessed locally other than through access-lists? I'm getting the hang
of access-lists (they seem bloody simple except for the inverted masks)
and I couldn't find any reference on the subject (other than using
ACLs).
Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Ferguson [SMTP:pferguso @
cisco .
com]
>Sent: Friday, November 15, 1996 8:29 AM
>To: Dan .
Johansson @
commentor .
se
>Cc: Firewalls Mailing list
>Subject: Re: Subnetmasks
>
>Yes, as long as you use a classless routing protocol, such as OSPF, EIGRP,
>Integrated IS-IS, or RIPv2.
>
>- paul
>
>At 02:08 PM 11/15/96 +0100, Dan Johansson wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I know this is a bit off topic, but here it goes.
>>
>>Can I split my C-class (xxx.yyy.zzz.0) network as follow?
>>
>>
>>Net 1 +---------+ Net 2
>>----------| Gateway |---------
>> +---------+
>> |
>> | Net 3
>> |
>>
>>Net 1: xxx.yyy.zzz.128 subnetmask 255.255.255.192
>> Hosts: xxx.yyy.zzz.129 - xxx.yyy.zzz.190
>>
>>Net 2: xxx.yyy.zzz.16 subnetmask 255.255.255.240
>> Hosts: xxx.yyy.zzz.17 - xxx.yyy.zzz.31
>>
>>Net 3: xxx.yyy.zzz.112 subnetmask 255.255.255.240
>> Hosts: xxx.yyy.zzz.113 - xxx.yyy.zzz.127
>>
>>
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>//Dan
>>
>
>--
>Paul Ferguson || ||
>Consulting Engineering || ||
>Herndon, Virginia USA |||| ||||
>tel: +1.703.397.5938 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
>e-mail: pferguso @
cisco .
com c i s c o S y s t e m s
>
|
|
