Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: name "Firewall"
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 12:04:10 -0500 (EST)
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199611152349 . SAA02787 @ mail . clark . net>

On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:

> I *strongly* believe that the term "firewall" was first applied to
> network devices as a damage limiting device, not as a security
> device. But security coopted the term.

The first time I heard the term "firewall", many years ago, it was in 
exactly the context of a damage limiting device, in an argument about 
bridging vs. routing in a large building lan.  But at that time, the 
local admins were trying to figure out why all of the different TCP/IP 
implementations wouldn't talk to each other, and a 286 looked like a 
powerful desktop computer.

Eat a package of natto first thing in the morning and nothing worse can happen  to you for the rest of the day.
Nick Simicich-njs @
 scifi .
 squawk .
 com 
(last choice)-nick_simicich @
 bocaraton .
 ibm .
 com
http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: ActiveX and RISKS
From: "Mark Joseph Edwards" <mark @ ntshop . net>
Next: Re: Microwave & Satelite
From: "robertp @ hal-pc . org" <robertp @ hal-pc . org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: name "Firewall"
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
Next: Re: name "Firewall"
From: swlodin @ delcoelect . com (Steve Lodin)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com