Firewalls: Re: ActiveX and RISKS

Firewalls
(November 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: ActiveX and RISKS
From:	"Mark Joseph Edwards" <mark @ ntshop . net>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 1996 10:17:36 -0600
To:	<Firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

Peter wasted bandwidth with:

>???
>What does CGI have to do with ActiveX?
>I'm afraid I must be missing some subtlety here.
>> It runs on top of Microsoft's Proxy Server.
>Oh boy, talk about setting the fox to guard the chickens.

What does your message have to do with this list? Go back to sleep.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ActiveX and RISKS
From: Benedikt Stockebrand <benedikt @ devnull . ruhr . de>
Re: ActiveX and RISKS
From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: ActiveX and RISKS From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Indexed By Date	Next:	RE:Incoming TCP Packet with Port 80 ?? From: arager @ mcgraw-hill . com
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	RE: ActiveX and RISKS From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: ActiveX and RISKS From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>