Firewalls: RE: ActiveX and Risks

Firewalls
(November 1996)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	RE: ActiveX and Risks
From:	carson @ lehman . com
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 1996 03:07:45 -0500
To:	Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Cc:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<2191B2309F33D0118F7000A02458D19C000000017DFB @ ns . rc . on . ca>
References:	<2191B2309F33D0118F7000A02458D19C000000017DFB @ ns . rc . on . ca>
Reply-to:	carson @ lehman . com

Unless I'm mistaken, TIS's Gaultlet can block ActiveX. I know FWTK
with the javablock patches can (it can block
java/javascript/vbscript/ActiveX).

--
Carson Gaspar -- carson @
 cs .
 columbia .
 edu carson @
 lehman .
 com
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html
<This is the boring business .sig - no outre sayings here>

References:

RE: ActiveX and Risks
From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	RE: ActiveX and Risks From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Indexed By Date	Next:	RE: ActiveX and Risks From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	RE: ActiveX and Risks From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	RE: ActiveX and Risks From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>