Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 01:03:10 +1100 (EDT)
To: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <01BBE1BB . EE8D6B40 @ fd . valuu . net> from "Rabbi Haim Cassorla" at Dec 4, 96 08:19:54 am

In some mail from Rabbi Haim Cassorla, sie said:
> 
> Please enlighten me as to why the firewall should care if it is =
> protecting unix, nt, cpm, or the farmer's underware.

You've missed the point of the discussion.  The Unix/NT/CPM or farmer's
underware is part of the firewall.  Firewall software is one part, the
hardware is another and the OS yet another.  If they can compromise your
HW, you've got other problems but if they can compromise your firewall
because your OS can't provide the required support for the f/w, do you
stick with thatt OS ?

Darren


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Next: Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
From: jegan @ iai . com (James Egan)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
Next: Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: Andy Howard <achowar @ erenj . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com