Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: screend
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:24:10 +1100 (EDT)
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM (Firewalls Mailing List)

Looking at screend, and its advances, are there any .o files for
Ultrix 4.[345] which bring its interface upto date with the recent
changes for BSD (such as passing ifp to ip_forwardscreen) ?  What
about Digital Unix (or OSF/1) ?

Also, something which I find a little concerning is the limit of
120 bytes in the ioctl, allowing only 98 bytes (or less) of IP header info
to be passed back.  This is less than the maximum size of a combined TCP/IP
header (both of which can be 64 bytes in size).  Has a solution to this
problem ever been found ?

Darren

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
From: Rudy Amid <rudy @ hcl . com>
Next: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Procom Question
From: Dave Sroelov <dsroelov @ pacbell . net>
Next: screend
From: "Young-jeong, CHO" <yjcho @ daewoo . dhi . co . kr>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com