|
Subject: |
authentication and encryption for dial-u |
|
From: |
HERVE .
H .
T .
TEMPLEREAU @
thomcom .
thomson .
fr |
|
Date: |
18 Dec 1996 09:35:47 +0100 |
|
To: |
firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM |
|
Alternate-recipient: |
Allowed |
|
Autoforwarded: |
FALSE |
|
Conversion: |
Allowed |
|
Conversion-with-loss: |
Allowed |
|
Delivery-date: |
18 Dec 1996 09:35:47 +0100 |
|
Importance: |
normal |
|
Message-type: |
Multiple Part |
|
Original-encoded-information-types: |
IA5-Text |
|
X400-content-type: |
P2-1984 |
|
X400-mts-identifier: |
[/PRMD=THOMSON/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR;961218174431] |
|
X400-originator: |
HERVE .
H .
T .
TEMPLEREAU @
thomcom .
thomson .
fr |
|
X400-received: |
by mta TFM-SMTP in /PRMD=internet/ADMD=atlas/C=fr; Relayed; 18 Dec 1996 09:35:47 +0100 |
|
X400-received: |
by mta M4000 in /PRMD=internet/ADMD=atlas/C=fr; Relayed; 18 Dec 1996 08:39:00 +0000 |
|
X400-received: |
by /PRMD=THOMSON/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR; Relayed; 18 Dec 1996 09:44:31 -0800 |
|
X400-recipients: |
firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM |
I've been asked to install a FireWall on our site,
with a connection to Internet and to dial-up lines
for people with PCs on the go.
I must provide a solution with authentication and encryption
on the fly for the remote PCs (not SSL), but the information i have on
the solutions provided (Checkpoint, Raptor and Gauntlet) is not sufficient.
Is there someone who could explain the pros and cons of the solutions :
* OS supported for the PCs (Windows 3.11, 95 or NT)
* installation of software on the PCs (modified PPP, TCP/IP or WinSock
?)
* performance
* administration of the crypto keys
* compatibility with existent software
Thanks.
|
|
