Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 15:02:01 -0500 (EST)
To: Jamie Thain <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
Cc: Dave Stagner <stagda @ sys1 . ic . ncs . com>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199612211816 . KAA01718 @ miles . greatcircle . com>

On Sat, 21 Dec 1996, Jamie Thain wrote:

> Java may call an ActiveX component, but ActiveX is not a language it is a
> program.  Java may one day be able to compile and create ActiveX controls,
> but as far as I know today, that is not a doable thing. JavaScript on the
> otherhand is a cut down version of Java which is limited in functionality.

No, Javascript is a renamed Livescript to fall into the marketing hype
surrounding Java.  Javascript has got nothing to do with Java.

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
Next: HELP Icon displayed in the system viewer (fwd)
From: Lee Whitty <lwhitty @ LANcomp . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
Next: ActiveX and Java Security
From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com