Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Wierd [ cisco revers telnet ports 200x ]
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi @ tavor . openu . ac . il>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 19:26:34 +0200 (IST)
To: "Jason T. Luttgens" <luttgenj @ kic . or . jp>
Cc: "'firewalls @ greatcircle . com'" <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <01BBEFF5 . D91E7AE0 @ ppp50 . kic . or . jp>

2001 is a reverse telnet to the aux port (defualt config)
of the top of my head 4001, 6001, 9001 are also the aux port with
differnet telnet options preset 
if you had multiple async interfaces ( such as a cisco T/S )
you would gave 2001-2000+n as reverse to telnet to the async ports
& 200+n+1 as acess to the aux port ) sam gox fot 4xxx,6xxx,9xxx
 I assum )

hope this helps,
		Rafi

P.S it would be nice if you wrapped your lines ....
-- 
Rafi Sadowsky                                   rafi @
 tavor .
 openu .
 ac .
 il
[postmaster @
 openu .
 ac .
 il]                        FAX: +972-3-6460744

On Sun, 22 Dec 1996, Jason T. Luttgens wrote:

> Does anyone know why cisco routers (the ones I ran strobe, a
> portscanner, on anyway) have port 2001, 4001, 6001, 9001 open as a
> regular telnet port that you can log into ?
> 
> Luck
> 



Follow-Ups:
References:
  • Wierd
    From: "Jason T. Luttgens" <luttgenj @ kic . or . jp>
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Dual-porting of DMZ systems, why?
From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
Next: RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Wierd
From: "Jason T. Luttgens" <luttgenj @ kic . or . jp>
Next: Re: Wierd [ cisco revers telnet ports 200x ]
From: Sameer Anja <sameer @ securities . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com