Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Cisco PIX
From: "Larson, Erik" <ELarson @ XLConnect . com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 17:40:15 -0500
To: "'keithstevens @ acsinc . net'" <keithstevens @ acsinc . net>, "'Firewalls-Digest @ GreatCircle . com'" <Firewalls-Digest @ GreatCircle . com>

I like the PIX in concept and sometimes in practice. I do wish it
offered client software to allow remote VPN access, however. That
particular feature is critical in much of the work we do for our
customer base.

-ekl



>-----Original Message-----
>From:	keithstevens @
 acsinc .
 net [SMTP:keithstevens @
 acsinc .
 net]
>Sent:	Sunday, January 05, 1997 11:14 PM
>To:	Firewalls-Digest @
 GreatCircle .
 com
>Subject:	Cisco PIX
>
>Is there a bastion host / proxy server that out-performs
>Cisco's PIX in throughput? Security? Ease of implementation?
>From my limited perspective as a newbie, the Cisco PIX in 
>combination with a good screening router is a very good 
>firewall. Not to be a wise guy, I'm seriously asking, with this 
>technology available, is there ever a reason to build one from
>scratch? I might be able to do it cheaper - but if it takes a couple
>weeks or a month to do It might cost more. I'm not in any way
>affiliated with Cisco.
>KeithStevens
>keith @
 acsinc .
 net
> 

Indexed By Date Previous: RE: packet filtering on PPP interfaces
From: bve @ omsk . quadrix . com (BVE)
Next: Re: NCSA != NCSC
From: proff @ suburbia . net
Indexed By Thread Previous: Cisco PIX
From: keithstevens @ acsinc . net (Keith Stevens)
Next: RE: Cisco PIX
From: Matthew Howard <mhoward @ cisco . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com