Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: RCP tcp/udp 111
From: "David J. Meltzer" <davem @ iss . net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 12:59:29 -0500 (EST)
To: Rob Sansom <sansom @ connectix . com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199701101608 . IAA16747 @ apu . connectix . com>

On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Rob Sansom wrote:
>
> RPC Portmapper.  Very bad to allow people to connect to this, since they can
> find out what sorts of RPC services you run on your host (if I'm correct).
> 
> At 04:34 PM 1/8/97 -0800, you wrote:
> >Can anyone comment on the security of rcp 
> >tcp/udp port 111.
> >

  That is certainly a true statement, but by blocking access to the
portmap service alone, you are really not preventing anyone from achieving
the same results.  It is quite feasible to do a UDP scan for RPC services
and by looking at the resulting RPC replies build up a list that is
identical to what the portmapper will return.  

-Dave

--------------------------------+---------------------
       David J. Meltzer         | Email: davem @
 iss .
 net 
       Systems Engineer         |   Web:   www.iss.net 
Internet Security Systems, Inc. |   Fax: (770)395-1972



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: FW-1 hacked? - Reply
From: "Gabriel Dura" <dura @ geocities . com>
Next: Re: registered IP addresses?
From: Sam Chepkevich <samc @ aloha . net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: RCP tcp/udp 111
From: Paul Danckaert <pauld @ magnet . com>
Next: Re: RCP tcp/udp 111
From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ saturn . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com