Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Highly available Internet connection
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 22:06:30 -0500 (EST)
To: "Starkweather, Mike" <mike . starkweather @ anheuser-busch . com>
Cc: "'firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM'" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <c=US%a=attmail%p=BUSCH%l=STLABCEXG010-970129224027Z-19370 @ stlabcexg001 . anheuser-busch . com>

Without two circuits, a local loop failure will take you down. You are 
much better off running two circuits, to two different ISPs, from two of 
your sites. Make sure you don't use two different ISPs that are both 
heavily dependant on the same MAE or NAP, or have heavily interdependant 
peering arangements, such that failure of a core router can still take out 
both.

-r.w.


On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Starkweather, Mike wrote:

> My company wants to move toward Electronic Commerce on the Internet. 
>  One of the requirements would be a highly available, secure 
> connection.  One of the ideas I have considered is two firewalls going 
> out over two routers to two wide area links to two ISPs.  This is a 
> pretty brute force approach.
> 
> Does anyone have any ideas to share on how we might build an Internet 
> connection that would approach 100 percent availability?
> 
> Thanks for all your help.
> 
> Mike Starkweather
> Anheuser-Busch
> 

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Secure Telneting into a internal network
From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
Next: RE: [NTSEC] ActiveX, MSIE and Quicken
From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Secure Telneting into a internal network
From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
Next: Re: Highly available Internet connection
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com