Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Security Design Issue
From: KENNETH PHANG <kent @ dataprep . com . my>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:12:18 +-800
To: "'Firewall digest'" <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

Hi everybody,

	Recently i'm looking into some of the network security design issue which i need second opinion from you guys. One of my customer has a network that runs on the FR cloud with about 13 remote sites link up to their enterprise router in the HQ. Each of the link are running a T1 and share a sigle E1 link into the HQ with partially  mesh environment with OSPF. Probably you can look at the diagram below for better understanding:-

	
		R1	R2	R3	R4	R.. Remote sites
		 |	 |	 |	 |	 |
		 |	 |	 |	 |	 | T1 link
		  \	 |	 |	 |	/
		    \	 |	 |	 |        /
			
			 (  Frame Relay	) _____________Internet

				 |    E1 link
				 R0			 R0 - HQ router
				 |			 R1 - Remote router site 1
				HQ			 R2 - Remote router site 2
				 |
				 |	LAN
		---------------------------------------------------

The FR provider already built their PVCs from all the remote sites to the HQ and another PVC from the HQ to the 
Internet. The HQ enterprise router can support multiple IP address configuration onto the same physical SYNC and Ethernet interface. I've been ask what is the best way to protect the network environment with FW-1. Sensitive information flow from the remote sites to the HQ must be protected so as the treat from Internet. By the way the FW-1 is also required to provide NAT to the remote sites and the HQ LAN. The customer to utilise the E1 link both for the remote links so as the Internet link. I understand that this is not a very good idea especially for security point of view. Hope to hear from you'll soon. All your comments are highly appreciated. 

Many thanz

Cheers
kent


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: http proxy problems / gauntlet
From: "Eduardo Romero U." <edo @ intranet . infocable . cl>
Next: Email Crashed Mail Server!
From: Steve Gallipeau <Steve @ hon . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: [linux-security] Re: Re: Linux virus
From: "R. DuFresne" <dufresne @ darkstar . sysinfo . com>
Next: RE: Security Design Issue
From: "Hicks, Rick" <RHicks @ hussmann . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com