Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: SLr* released. rsh,rcp,rdist over SSL
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:10:04 -0600 (CST)
To: benedikt @ devnull . ruhr . de (Benedikt Stockebrand)
Cc: manek @ challenger . atc . fhda . edu, sjg @ zen . quick . com . au, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <87n2tdmsvm . fsf @ devnull . ruhr . de> from "Benedikt Stockebrand" at Feb 10, 97 01:01:17 am

> > Also I suppose i should ask is does sslr* have an officially sanctioned
> > port number? and ofcourse does it have an rfc?

> It uses port 22, which is still unassigned to my last version of the
> Assigned Numbers (RFC 1700, 1994/10).  Until now there's no RFC about
> it, but the package comes with a draft.

Not good. That's what ssh is using too.

My big question, is SSLr* proxyable? SSH isn't (you have to log in to the
proxy host, then run a separate ssh from there, which rules out SCP and
the like).


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: [NTSEC] ActiveX, MSIE and Quicken
From: "Starkweather, Mike" <mike . starkweather @ anheuser-busch . com>
Next: NWM: SNMP/Scripts/Freeware (off topic)
From: Brad Daugherty <bsd @ pobox . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: SLr* released. rsh,rcp,rdist over SSL
From: Benedikt Stockebrand <benedikt @ devnull . ruhr . de>
Next: Re: SLr* released. rsh,rcp,rdist over SSL
From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ zen . quick . com . au>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com