Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: A Comment on Content
From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 16:17:34 -0800 (PST)
To: "Fir E. Walls" <walls @ linux . silkroad . com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199702211932 . OAA26355 @ linux . silkroad . com>

Actually KM has a valid point

Evaluated Code at the B2, B3 and A1 levels DOES include code review
for MAC control internal to the host (Which does include buffer
overwrites and stack overflows)

Persoal Opinion provided by
Leonard Miyata
Gemini Computers Inc.

On Fri, 21 Feb 1997, Fir E. Walls wrote:

> > 
> > I also feel a discussion of multilevel security is valid and useful for those 
> 
> Great!  Then enjoy a discussion, by all means.
> 
> But the discussion of multi-level security which you find so interesting
> has little to do with my question (and I should know, since it is my
> question).
> 
> However, since you appear to believe that my questions and technical
> interests are yours to hi-jack according to your agenda, then 
> go ahead and start a thread on anything you wish.         
> 
> The discussion I am interesting in (since the original comment were
> mine) is buffer overflowing on the stack and what vendors are doing
> to insure this vunerability is mitigated in their code (period).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> > KM
> 


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: ftp thru Netscape on SNG
From: chris sieber <sieber @ Colorado . EDU>
Next: RE: irc and firewalls
From: Kevin McPeake <cowboy @ home . byelex . nl>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: A Comment on Content
From: "Fir E. Walls" <walls @ linux . silkroad . com>
Next: Re: A Comment on Content
From: Tom Friday <tom @ shadow . cyberdesic . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com