Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: virus checking
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:42:09 -0600 (CST)
To: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199703021211 . EAA04849 @ miles . greatcircle . com> from "harley @ icrf . icnet . uk" at Mar 2, 97 12:10:25 pm

> > > Perhaps we ought to start getting rid of the OS's that don't use
> > > (this modern concept of) protected memory instead?

> > That would be nice, but protected memory won't stop an EXE infector from
> > invading an NT box.

> Or a boot-sector or partition-sector infection on an NT box (or any
> other x86 machine, regardless of operating system). 

Um, yes, it will keep a boot sector infector from infecting a box. You
can't write to the boot sector under NT or UNIX from a user program.

(you're still subject to floppy infections, but we're talking firewalls,
 not armed guards in computer labs)


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: virus checking
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Next: Another recipe to add to your ActiveX filters....
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: virus checking
From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
Next: Re: virus checking
From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com