Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Firewall and "single point of failure" issue
From: Joseph Judge <joej @ joesmac . ultranet . com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 17:31:56 -0500
To: "firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>, "'uskanbye @ ibmmail . com'" <uskanbye @ ibmmail . com>

I'm dealing with some of this currently, also. I've gotten some issues 
resolved ... and some not.

Where I have packet filters ... I do a hot-standby (tough issue is just
keeping their configs in sync, nice issue is that this provides a 
'secondary' box to implement changes on and verify before hitting
the primary box). If I did something in parallel here (these are not
routers, but IP Filter boxes), I'd be stuck doing routing protocol
... and that doesn't make me fell all happy inside.

Where I have application level gateways, I do them in parallel -
so I can tolerate an outage. Also, go as far as you can - buy
hot-swappable things (RAID, etc ... money isnt' the biggest
problem of mine, so you mileage may vary).

It is not worth falling back to network-level filtering for my
company ... again, your policy - your choice. I just wouldn't

Biggest thing for me, since my support staff is a separate group
under a separate manager, is to DOCUMENT the procedures for
disaster recovery, fail-over, etc, etc. .... Don't leave them 
standing around scratching their heads or calling you at 3am.
Big bonus here is, if you are hit by a truck then the company
can keep going forward.


---- joe


----------
From:  uskanbye @
 ibmmail .
 com[SMTP:uskanbye @
 ibmmail .
 com]
Sent:  Wednesday, March 12, 1997 2:24 PM
To:  firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
Subject:  Firewall and "single point of failure" issue

In an environment with a single network connection to the Internet guarded
by a firewall, what's the best strategy for providing fault-tolerance to
this connection?

A few things we're looking at:

- aggressive service and response-time (< 2 hrs) requirements for firewall HW
- a "standby" preconfigured firewall HW box that we'd plug in if primary down
- in case of firewall failure, fall back on router packet filtering
  without a firewall in place.

Comments?  What are you doing?

     --------KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT---------
     ---------------WWW.STATE.KS.US/PUBLIC/KDHE----------------
     ----------Mills Bldg Suite 501 Topeka, KS 66612-----------
     ---------Phone (913) 296-5643 FAX (913) 296-8943----------




Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: VPN Choices ?
From: joe_miller @ administaff . com
Next: Re: Firewall and "single point of failure" issue
From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . eng . mindspring . net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewall and "single point of failure" issue
From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
Next: Re: Firewall and "single point of failure" issue
From: Christian ALT <calt @ tla . ch>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com