Firewalls: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship

Firewalls
(June 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From:	Geoff Mulligan <geoff @ mulligan . com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 1997 11:02:42 -0600
To:	Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>
Cc:	"Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 1997 11:49:24 EDT." <3 . 0 . 32 . 19970604114909 . 00952700 @ the-wire . com>

anton @
 the-wire .
 com said:
> One public address, and a 10.x.x.x of internal addresses and web
> servers. POW! The address space problem just went away.  

Just get a box that does Network address translation and POW you have a class 
a on one side and couple of addresses on the other.

That's what I have, not that I really need a class a for my dozen or so 
machines.

	geoff

References:

Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	[SNI-14]: Solaris rpcbind vulnerability From: Oliver Friedrichs <oliver @ silence . secnet . com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	firewall setup From: "Sameer R. Manek" <manek @ challenger . atc . fhda . edu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship From: "Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>