Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: "Carl V. Claunch" <carl @ hdshq . com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 12:15:59 -0700
To: fwtk <fwtk-users @ tis . com>, firewalls <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>

At 10:31 AM 6/2/97 -0400, Ken Kempster wrote:
>[To be removed from this list send the message "unsubscribe fwtk-users" in the
>BODY of a mail message to majordomo @
 ex .
 tis .
 com .
 ]
>
>Hi all,
>
>        Has anyone gotten a one to many relationship to work
>with FWTK 2.0?
>
>        I want to be able to specify x.x.x.x plug-to *
>                        or
>                                     x.x.x.x plug-to x.x.x.x x.x.x.x etc.
>
>
>thanx for any help.
>

What semantics are you expecting with this? We have a patch to plug-gw
that will try alternate addresses in sequence until a successful 
connection occurs. It is used mainly for automating access through
backup paths. If this is what you want, I could be persuaded to 
have someone here make this publicly available as a contribution.



Indexed By Date Previous: RE: ISP Connection
From: "Feeney, Tim" <Tim . Feeney @ fmr . com>
Next: HELp on SNG config...
From: Cihan Subasi <csubasi @ garanti . com . tr>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: carson @ lehman . com
Next: Re: Plug-gw- One to many relationship
From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com