Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: [FW1] Out of Band Data Attack against NT-Hosts
From: Thierry GUINET <thierry @ namsa . nato . int>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 11:53:36 +0100
To: Robert Sthlbrand <robert . stahlbrand @ nmac . ericsson . se>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <43BED8177D10D011A69A0800092C15D7011BFD @ haig . oplab . nmac . ericsson . se>

Robert Ståhlbrand wrote:
> 
> What is the problem here???
> Of course (as Mike Hedlund says) is a NT-machine (win95 and win3.11 as
> well) only vulnerable to the OOB-bug on port 139 (netbios) and I REALLY

I hope I'm doing a false assertion, but I think  your wrong, I read that
some tests have been done, using urgent flag against port 80 and that it
worked just fine :(
I don't have the paper under the eyes but if you're interrested I can
dig into my archives.

Thierry

-- 
Thierry Guinet 
T .
 Guinet @
 namsa .
 nato .
 int

Phone: +352/30.63-6812		Fax: +352/30.87.21

In order to create an apple pie from scratch, you must first
create the universe.
				Carl Sagan


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: SecuRemote on FireWall-1 3.0
From: Cristina Ceballos <Cristina @ iponet . es>
Next: RE: PIX and FW-1 (packet filter Question)
From: Consultancy Group <spreston @ ozemail . com . au>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: [FW1] Out of Band Data Attack against NT-Hosts
From: Robert Ståhlbrand <robert . stahlbrand @ nmac . ericsson . se>
Next: RE: [FW1] Out of Band Data Attack against NT-Hosts
From: "Jim E. Crawford" <jcrawford @ wilcom . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com