Firewalls: Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies

Firewalls
(June 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies
From:	"Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>
Date:	Sun, 08 Jun 1997 14:22:18 +1000
To:	Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Cc:	"Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg @ quick . com . au>, firewalls <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to:	Your message of "07 Jun 97 18:26:27 EDT." <199706080120 . SAA28918 @ notesgw2 . sybase . com>

> You seem to be under the impression that SPFs
> aren't capable of understaning the protocol
> being routed... if that were the case, the non-encrypted

No, I'm simply commenting on what exists - not what is theoretically
possible.

--sjg

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>