Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re[2]: DHCP and Firewall 1
From: "dennis keller" <dennis_keller @ smtp . ddre . dla . mil>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 97 12:43:54 est
To: geoffb @ NOJUNKunixpac . com . au, Mike Jones <mike . jones @ unifiedtech . com>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

     On the DHCP debate.  We are going to use Cisco's DNS/DHCP Manager.  
     It's true that you can set up IP addresses to be assigned for a long 
     time, 6 months to a year using Cisco's product.  But you also use 
     static IP addresses for your servers'.  FireWall-1 can handle DHCP 
     using address translation.  I'm surprised that someone from Checkpoint 
     hasn't entered the debate.  I asked the same question a few months ago 
     and was assured by Checkpoint that FireWall-1 v3.0 can handle DHCP.
     
     Dennis Keller
     Computer Specialist
     DLA, Admin Support Center East
     New Cumberland, PA
     email: dkeller @
 ddre .
 dla .
 mil 


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: DHCP and Firewall 1
Author:  Mike Jones <mike .
 jones @
 unifiedtech .
 com> at internet01
Date:    6/10/97 10:45 AM


This is a multi-part message in MIME format. 
--------------4A6AF6B824BB52C1FBB9A2A3 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
     
Geoff Breach wrote:
> On Mon,  9 Jun 97 16:44:44 -0400, donaldb @
 ncmi-ny .
 com (Donald Branch) 
> wrote:
> >I have a Windows NT machine running DHCP  I want to be able from 
> >that one machine to be able to get out to AOL but since it's ip
> >address keeps changing  I can't make a rule based on his ip address. 
> >keeps changing
> Only one way. Keep it's IP address from changing. If you configure 
> your DHCP server to always hand out the same address to that
> machine's MAC address, you get a middle ground between the benefits 
> of DHCP and the benefits of fixed addressing.
     
Not so. You can use user authentication on the outbound FTP 
session.
     
>  Yeah, there are other ways, authenticate, etc, but too much 
> trouble IMHO.
     
Too much trouble? For a single user? If it were for 50 users, 
then yeah, but for one it's no biggie.
     
As far as that goes, if you are using a reasonably large (say, 
a month or more) lease time on your DHCP server the IP address 
of the machine you're working on will never change unless you 
go off the network (e.g., don't turn the machine one) for over 
a month. So the idea of doing it by IP address isn't completely 
out of the question. DHCP doesn't have to be minute-by-minute 
dynamic in most environments to be useful.
     
--
 Mike Jones
 Sr. Technology Advisor
 UNIFIED Technologies
--------------4A6AF6B824BB52C1FBB9A2A3
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Mike Jones 
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"
     
begin:          vcard
fn:             Mike Jones
n:              Jones;Mike
org:            Unified Technologies
adr:            ;;105 Jordan Road;Troy;NY;12180;US 
email;internet: mike .
 jones @
 unifiedtech .
 com
title:          Sr. Technology Advisor 
tel;work:       (518) 283-1003
tel;fax:        (518) 283-1189
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
end:            vcard
     
     
--------------4A6AF6B824BB52C1FBB9A2A3--
     


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff @ mulligan . com>
Next: Re: Stateful Packet Filters vs. Proxies
From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: DHCP and Firewall 1
From: itjjw01 @ bender . com (John Waterbury)
Next: Re: DHCP and Firewall 1
From: Rick Hardy <rick @ rapid . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com