Firewalls: Re: packet is too small

Firewalls
(June 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: packet is too small
From:	"Eric V. Smith" <EricSmith @ windsor . com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 1997 11:57:12 -0400 (EDT)
To:	firewalls @ scientia . com (Ian Miller)
Cc:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<199706251136 . MAA04892 @ h01 . scientia . com> from "Ian Miller" at Jun 25, 97 12:35:18 pm
Reply-to:	EricSmith @ windsor . com

In what way is the solution in RFC 1858 flawed?  Is there a discussion of
this anywhere I could look at?

Eric.

Ian Miller wrote:
> (See RFC1858 which gives an excellent description of the problem
> but a flawed solution.)

-- 
Eric V. Smith           | For opinion in good men is but knowledge 
EricSmith @
 windsor .
 com   |     in the making.
Windsor Software Corp   +----------------------------------+ John Milton
http://www.windsor.com/   Windows NT, Unix, SQL Server     |  1608-74

References:

Re: packet is too small
From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Securing NT Web servers From: mcnabb @ argus-systems . com (Paul McNabb)
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: 33xxx Ports From: "This guy here at this system..." <morrison @ ladyred . rsoc . rockwell . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: packet is too small From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: packet is too small From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>