Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Remote management of firewalls internationally
From: Jack Danahy <jdanahy @ bbn . com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 07:54:12 -0400
To: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
Cc: Alan <alano @ teleport . com>, Mark Teicher <mht @ clark . net>, firewalls @ greatcircle . com

K -

I've stumbled through the encryption regulations in a couple
of lives, and my experience has been:

Two things:

        1) If you are a US-owned multinational, you
           can have encryption, limited to 56 bits, on
           your machine, so long as noone outside your
           company has access to the facilities of
           that machine.  Also, noone outside your company
           can have physical access to the machine, such
           as local outsourced system support personnel.
           
           If your are performing all of your key management
           from the US, that may, as well, mitigate difficulties.

           Check with your beagles about specifics for your
           situation.

        2) Your Frankfurt office may prove particularly
           thorny, however, as there exist German regulations
           prohibiting any type of employee monitoring which
           can be used as a performance metric.  Since most
           of the walls generate user/usage stats, be aware.
           YMMV.

I have no idea on the China encryption front.

Jack

At 11:41 PM 6/30/97 -0500, Ken Hardy wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Alan wrote:
>> > How can one remotely manage firewalls that are on the other side of the
world?
>... 
>> If you have SSH or some other form of encryption/authentication between
>> machines, then you should be able to maintain the firewall without too
>> many problems.  (Some sort of token-based authorization system or Public
>> Key system would be a big plus and/or requirement in such a system.)
>
>But it might be difficult to get SSH or other form of encryption on
>that machine on the other side of the world if your side happens to lie
>in the U.S.
>
>Not to start a wandering and unrelated thread (hint hint), but I've
>wondered how the law would apply if I were to log in to a machine in,
>say, our company's Frankfurt office via the corporate WAN and built and
>installed SSH on that machine while sitting in our U.S. office.  Would
>my work in doing the installation be considered exporting the encryption
>in some manner, even if the software didn't get on the machine from or
>through the U.S.?  Of course, it reasons (if that word can be applied
>to U.S.  encryption policy) that I'd be on much shakier ground if the
>SSH code from a site in Finland or Australia got on the German machine
>via the company's Internet connection in the U.S.
>
>On a tenuously related note, does anyone know whether China's ban on
>the use of encryption now extends to Hong Kong?
>
>--
>K
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Danahy                                            jdanahy @
 bbn .
 com
Manager of Engineering                             Tel: (617) 873-4418
BBN Corporation                                    Fax: (617) 873-6846



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Safeword with Radius - dont read unless you know these products
From: manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt
Next: Re: Network surveillance product?
From: Jack Danahy <jdanahy @ bbn . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Safeword with Radius - dont read unless you know these products
From: manuel . ricca @ pararede . pt
Next: Re: Remote management of firewalls internationally
From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com