Is there any patched/hacked IOS images floating around or is there any
way to load custom processes in a Cisco? Is there a risk that somebody
could use a Cisco for password collection or such? Should One routinely
do a checksum check on the images used in Cisco?s?
Not everybody has pets who can learn it?s new name each 90 day. Hence
there is a risk for unauthorized access to Ones Cisco.
/PerJ
Nick Simicich wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Bertrum Carroll wrote:
>
> > It looks as if most of these attacks require access to the router
> > console. If this is true, that's pretty good security.
> >
> > Or did I miss something?
>
> Like, maybe, lots of people put modems on their Cisco consoles so that
> they can fix their routers remotely?
>
> Of course my password is the same as my pet's name.
> My macaw's name was Q47pY!3, but I change it every 90 days.
References:
|
|
