Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Chicago Network Security Specialist Position
From: Nathan Steinbauer <nathan @ datasource . net>
Organization: DataSource Hagen
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 10:40:25 -0500
To: Jim Harmon <jharmon @ telecnnct . com>
Cc: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>, "Sadler, Connie J" <csadler @ arkons . lmsc . lockheed . com>, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, "'Don . Allen @ whittman-hart . com'" <Don . Allen @ whittman-hart . com>
References: <Pine . LNX . 3 . 91 . 970723222850 . 22213A-100000 @ gargoyle> <33D7888E . FF6D5DF @ telecnnct . com>
Reply-to: nathan @ datasource . net

Right on, brother.


Jim Harmon wrote:
> 
> It would be far more appropriate IMHO to have a seperate "Jobs
> Wanted/Needed/Offered" distribution list all it's own, with a
> free-for-all attitude about job opennings, listings, resumes, etc.
> 
> It would be a cool resource for anyone on either side of the work-slot
> market.
> 
> THEN I could see a REASONABLE alternative notice of 1-2 sentences posted
> to groups like firewalls on a monthly basis reminding us that there is a
> jobs list and how to subscribe/unsubscribe to it.
> 
> No wasted bandwidth here, and the same blurb could be wide-area
> broadcast on other professional distributions (limit, 1-per-month!)
> lists with just as little impact to the general population.
> 
> Who knows, perhaps there already IS one that ISN'T being broadcast all
> over.
> 
> One little message once/month and discussions like THIS one wouldn't
> spring up and suck-down the bandwidth.
> 
> Anyone agree?
> 
> Paul D. Robertson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Sadler, Connie J wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps it would be helpful for all subscribers if we had a "groundrule"
> > > for this kind of activity on the firewalls list. I have heard opinions
> > > both ways, and personally it doesn't bother me to see these posts from
> > > time to time. My delete key works very well. But maybe there is a list
> > > admin who could provide some general guidance - or we could get some
> > > general consensus?
> >
> > Traditionally it's been off-topic, and frowned upon.  Since a lot of
> > folks read the list from work with their employer's equipment.  Also,
> > there are thousands of recruiters internationally, the signal to noise
> > ratio would get even worse than the NSA/Mossad stuff.
> >
> > Paul
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
> > proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
> >                                                                      PSB#9280
> 
> --
>    Jim Harmon                           The Telephone Connection
> jim @
 telecnnct .
 com                          Rockville, Maryland

-- 
Nathan Steinbauer
Internet Consultant
DataSource Hagen
612.844.1459
nathan @
 datasource .
 net
http://www.datasource.net


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall-1 Limitations...
From: george @ neato . org
Next: RE: NAT x Tunneling
From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Chicago Network Security Specialist Position
From: Alfred Huger <huger @ silence . secnet . com>
Next: Re: IBM Support of FW-1 on AIX
From: Roger Rea <rrea @ us . ibm . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com