Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: dual-homing and dual-addressing ?
From: Alexis Vassiliadis <aav @ mist . intec . ru>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 13:49:17 +0500
To: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
Disposition-notification-to: <aav @ mist . intec . ru>
Fine-version: 1.0
In-reply-to: <m0wrEZS-00014AC @ lina . inka . de>
References: <3 . 0 . 1 . 32 . 19970723215120 . 009f8210 @ 195 . 64 . 195 . 129> <3 . 0 . 1 . 32 . 19970723215120 . 009f8210 @ 195 . 64 . 195 . 129>

Hi,

Thank you for your answers,

It seems to be a real problem: 
	Many organizations don't have and don't need the large address
space to live with BGP with today's /19-filtering.

I'm VERY interersted How do networkers solve this problem?

In advance,

Alexis.

At 05:28 24.07.97 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>On Jul 23, Alexis Vassiliadis wrote
>> Suppose I'm dual-homed, my web-server have 2 ip-addresses from 2 different 
>> spaces of 2 different providers. 
>
>Yes.. most of the time.
>
>> Will it be "backup" if one of my 2 links to providers will go down?
>> I.e., Does a browser poll another address from dns-reply if 1st is not
>> available?
>
>Yes and now. Usually the Browser will not try all of the A Records, but the
>first one. The "first" one is different on each query, since the DNS Servers
>and Resolvers do RR rolling. A user will need to 'reload' and perhaps the
>browser does a new Lookup. This will most likely fail with Proxies in
>between, cause Proxies do DNS Caching and negative Connection Caching on
>Host-name base.
>
>If one ISP fails you will be still reachable, but not without troubles to
>the users. (it is of course better than 1 ISP, but not as failsafe as one
>might guess).



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Virus Scanner
From: Pauline van Winsen - Uniq Professional Services <Pauline . van . Winsen @ uniq . com . au>
Next: a general question
From: "Shakila Shayan" <S-SHAYAN @ KARUN . ipm . ac . ir>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: dual-homing and dual-addressing ?
From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists @ lina . inka . de>
Next: Problems with MS Internet Explorer 4.0 beta 2
From: Bill_Royds @ pch . gc . ca

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com