Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Re: Virus Scanner
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:53:47 -0400
To: "Button, Dave" <Dave . Button @ GSC . GTE . Com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <c=US%a=_%p=GTE%l=NDHM06-970728184319Z-48344 @ ndhm06 . ndhm . gt egsc.com>

At 02:43 PM 07/28/97 -0400, Button, Dave wrote:

>
>This assertion is certainly one of many that are unprovable, but isn't
>the rationale behind server authentication, which should precede much of
>the encrypted transmission, that the server has more accountability? And
>if the server is more accountable they will, in theory, be more careful
>about what they transmit.
>

Perhaps, but don't confuse accountability with prevention.  While both are
aspects of security, they are not mutually exclusive.

- paul


--
Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
Herndon, Virginia   USA                                ||||      ||||
tel: +1.703.397.5938                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso @
 cisco .
 com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s

Indexed By Date Previous: re: Firewall alerts of rouge Inet connection
From: Hassan Karim <hkarim @ cq . com>
Next: Re: Why controlling Source IP address on a Firewall?
From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Re: Virus Scanner
From: Jerry Huyghe <jerry @ eliashim . com>
Next: Re: Re: Virus Scanner
From: David Harley <harley @ icrf . icnet . uk>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com