Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(July 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re: Virus Scanner
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:47:37 -0500 (CDT)
To: rick @ tis . com (Rick Murphy)
Cc: jerry @ eliashim . com, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, mccrebsi @ ina . de, pferguso @ cisco . com
In-reply-to: <3 . 0 . 1 . 32 . 19970730084359 . 006fd6d4 @ pop . rv . tis . com> from "Rick Murphy" at Jul 30, 97 08:43:59 am

> >I also forgot the 2nd option (ATTENTION FIREWALL DEVELOPERS! :-)) may be to
> >have the firewall send a message to the browser while the file is being
> >scanned by the CVP server (such as please wait, checking for viruses) What
> >do you think, Rick?

> That can't be done by the firewall - the web browser asked for a file and
> expects either an OK followed by a data stream or an error code. Without
> redefining the HTTP protocol - and getting the browsers to understand your
> extension - there's no way to make this work.

Sure it can. You simply generate three pages in a row:

1. One with the right URL, and a "redirect" tag, pointing to:
2. One with the message, and a "reload" tag, telling to to load:
3. The virus-checked page, back to the right URL.

The firewall will have to keep a bit of state, but this should work. In fact
you might be able to get by without the intermediate page... just return
the page with a reload tag and the message.


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MX records
From: Jeff Porter <jporter @ verio . net>
Next: Re: DOS firewall?
From: Rich Schaller <rich @ ezgate . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re: Virus Scanner
From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
Next: Re: Re: Virus Scanner
From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com