Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: DOS firewall?
From: mikech @ avana . net
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 03:40:38 -0500
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, Travis Low <tlow @ mindq . com>
References: <3 . 0 . 32 . 19970730075724 . 00a894f4 @ alterdial . uu . net>

Travis:

Since no one else mentioned us, check out:

	http://www.iproute.com

A couple of benefits with DOS firewalls. These also apply to most real-time 
OS's.

-Don't forget that DOS is still used by Microsoft Windows 95,  they just 
disguise it.

-If improperly configured, many firewalls based on other operating systems 
such as UNIX or Microsoft NT can be subverted and used as a platform to attack 
its own trusted network (thus the whole discussion on B2 level security). 
Since these operating systems contain IP stacks independent of the Firewall 
software, even if the Firewall fails, the IP packets could still get through. 

-IPRoute/Secure utilizes the DOS operating system to help ensure that if the 
Firewall software should fail that the firewall system cannot be used to 
breach the trusted network. IPRoute/Secure is a true, transparent firewall 
system. This means that there is not an independent IP stack on the system and 
if the firewall software should fail, there is absolutely no way to get 
through the network interfaces on the DOS system to the trusted network via 
any protocol. This provides the most secure of firewall environments: a 
security kernel approach where the firewall software controls all access to or 
from the system to the exclusion of all other types of activities (e.g. 
routing). In this manner, DOS actually complements the security of the product 
environment. 

-Because of low system overhead we have one of the fastest VPN IPSec 
implementations around.

-It is pretty crash-proof. We just use DOS for booting and the File I/O. 
Customers have stuck these Firewalls in a closet for a year without rebooting 
it.

-You can run it on just about any legacy system. A 386 with 1 Meg of RAM will 
easily handle a 128K ISDN connection for about 20 workstations.

-We can boot and run off of a single floppy.

-It scales well. Throw a fast Pentium at it with some RAM and you can have 
multiple 100 megabit interfaces all running at full speed (limited by the Bus 
of course). We use our own DOS extender and mutlitask code.

-Support for a large number of packet drivers (300 at last count including 
Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI, V.35, Frame Relay and ISDN).

-It is cheap.

-Hey, DOS is available just about anywhere in the world, especially Eastern 
Europe.

-Like in real estate, no OS overhead, no OS overhead, no OS overhead ;-)

Just our philosophy. We don't claim to be the end-all, be-all of Firewalls. If 
you want a lot of fine grained control over logs, access, protocols, proxies, 
etc. then you will probably go with UNIX or NT. We also don't write the packet 
drivers. You are at the mercy of your NIC vendor for those.

BTW, If you haven't figured it out ;-) I do work for 'em.

Mike
--
03:40:39
08/01/97
_______________________________________________________________________
Michael W. Chalkley                                Tel: +1.770.772.4567
ZapNet! Inc.                                       Fax: +1.770.475.7640
Suite 400-120                                E-mail: mikech @
 iproute .
 com
10945 State Bridge Road                                mikech @
 avana .
 net
Alpharetta, GA 30202                             http://www.iproute.com


Indexed By Date Previous: Taxonomy of TCP Attacks
From: <kgibbs @ best . com>
Next: Re: SNMP, SunNET Manager and security
From: Konstantin Agouros <Konstantin_Agouros @ genua . de>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Taxonomy of TCP Attacks
From: <kgibbs @ best . com>
Next: Re: SNMP, SunNET Manager and security
From: Konstantin Agouros <Konstantin_Agouros @ genua . de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com