Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: CLUSTERED FIREWALLS
From: Dennis_Gnatowski @ USFG . COM
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 16:19:37 -0400
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

I've worked with TIS Gauntlet firewall and HP's MC/ServiceGuard clustering
and the combination seems quite nice.

-Dennis Gnatowski
dennis_gnatowski @
 usfg .
 com
USF&G




From: IBMMAIL(I1106407)@IBMMAIL(I1106407) on 08/28/97 03:37 PM

To:   Dennis Gnatowski/USFG @
 USFG
cc:
Subject:  CLUSTERED FIREWALLS

Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:02:43 -0700
From: Bill Stout <stoutb @
 pios .
 com>
Subject: Clustered firewalls
To: firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com

Anyone running clustered firewalls?

I'm experimenting with Altavista FWs on TruClusters for UNIX.  Dropping
defcon level while TruCluster runs, don't work.  State is not maintained on
failover.

I'd like to compare notes.

Bill Stout
______________________________________________________________________
Evil SPAM sites:
http://www.cyberpromo.com/
http://www.targ-it.com/  (800-web-pro1)
http://www.did-it.com/   (provides list for targ-it.com)

To remove from cyberpromo lists:
http://www.iemmc.org/remove.htm
Cyberpromo will start selling their list 9/2/97, excluding iemmc filtered
addresses.


---- End of mail text

Additional SMTP headers from original mail item follow:
Received: from relay3.UU.NET by E-MAIL.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP;
   Thu, 28 Aug 97 15:37:01 EDT
Received: from honor.greatcircle.com by relay3.UU.NET with ESMTP
   (peer crosschecked as: honor.greatcircle.com [198.102.244.44!)
   id UNdepa13017; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 15:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (majordom @
 localhost) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.
8.5/Honor-Lists-9703
08-1) id LAA29315 for firewalls-outgoing; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:48:17 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pse01.pios.com (PSE01.PIOS.COM [199.33.129.2!) by
honor.greatcir
cle.com (8.8.5/Honor-970824-1) with SMTP id KAA20734 for
<firewalls @
 greatcircle
.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 10:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pse01.pios.com; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA29687; Thu, 28 Aug
199
7 14:03:20 -0400
Received: from vaxd.PIOS.COM (vaxd.PIOS.COM)
 by gemini.pios.com (PMDF V5.0-6 #18985)
 id <01IMZ4W3X5GW8WYVHJ @
 gemini .
 pios .
 com> for firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com;
Thu,
 28 Aug 1997 14:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cal_133.cal.pios.com (cal02.CAL.PIOS.COM)
 by PIOS.PIOS.COM (PMDF V5.0-6 #18984) id
<01IMZ4VNDW7K90NMR3 @
 PIOS .
 PIOS .
 COM>
 for firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 14:03:04 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender: stoutb @
 192 .
 168 .
 0 .
 37
Message-Id: <2 .
 2 .
 32 .
 19970828180243 .
 0092af7c @
 192 .
 168 .
 0 .
 37>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
Precedence: bulk








Indexed By Date Previous: Re: data protection in the hard-drive
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ nfr . net>
Next: Re: Web Security Sourcebook
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ nfr . net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Clustered firewalls
From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
Next: Gauntlet Performance
From: rwm <rmcm001 @ us . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com