Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: about sendmail security
From: Chris Briggs <chris @ cougar . alscomp . com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ pccmis . com>
Cc: "'firewalls @ greatcircle . com'" <firewalls @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <c=US%a=_%p=PC_Central%l=BDC9000-970905144449Z-18 @ bdc9000 . pccmis . com>

On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Chris Brenton wrote:
> Humm. How about a process that not only checks that the source IP 
> address can be resolved to a valid host, but that it can be resolved 
> back to a system which also has a valid MX record.
> 
> Just a thought...

The latest smail beta does this, along with other checks intended to deny 
relaying spam, or at least make it a little more difficult. Generated 
quite a bit of talk on the smail list a month or so ago because Greg 
enabled those checks by default and a lot of people found their DNS was 
incomplete... You can get smail at ftp.planix.com/pub/Smail.

-cb
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Briggs                                       chris @
 cougar .
 alscomp .
 com
A.L.S. Computer Systems                                  Network Specialist

Gan, if you're trying to scare me, you're succeeding.
    -- Vila  [Time Squad]



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: FW1 - log messages
From: kb @ pp-ulm . de
Next: RE: about sendmail security
From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ pccmis . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: about sendmail security
From: Ed Forbes <ejf @ bbnplanet . com>
Next: RE: about sendmail security
From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton @ pccmis . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com