Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Microsoft vs The world
From: "osiris @ gnss . com" <osiris @ gnss . com>
Organization: Global Network Security Systems
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 09:46:09 -0700
To: Bryan Wilkerson <bryanw @ reston . ans . net>
Cc: Pio Gaeta <gaeta @ dec . netgroup . it>, "fernando @ boemia . pix . com . br" <fernando @ boemia . pix . com . br>, "firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>
References: <199709151602 . AA16638 @ interlock . reston . ans . net>
Reply-to: osiris @ gnss . com

Bryan Wilkerson wrote:

> Pardon me for interjecting here.  But aren't most versions of Unix
> proprietary?  Xenix, Ultrix, AIX (among others) all only run on 1 manufacturer's
> computers and that happens to be the same manufacturer that makes the O/S.
>

No, I don't agree on that, but I will withdraw those statements because it has now resulted in more mail
than it's worth. (AIX has run on several platforms and so has XENIX. Linux runs on practically any
platform and etc, etc.) My statement about backward compatibility was a mistake, true. Nevertheless, M$
has produced no open platform, nor one that conforms to standards in any suitable fashion. The question
wasn't what hardware the OS ran on, the argument I made was interoperability. And specifically, the move
towards POSIX compliance. M$ has made no such move nor will they.


Indexed By Date Previous: ipsend - version 2.0 - send arbitrary IP packets.
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: packet fragmentation attacks & ip-route caching
From: "Erik R. van Zuuren" <e . v . zuuren @ aranea . nl>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re: Microsoft vs The world
From: Anton J Aylward <anton @ the-wire . com>
Next: RE: Microsoft vs The world
From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com