> As for the previous poster, I don't think that I would decide on
>Gauntlet unless I had already put a few more firewalls on a testbed.
>Gauntlet is rated fairly well as far as security goes, but it's
>performance figures suck. It drops packets left and right when under
>high loads. If you want a contact # of a rep I know that would be happy
>to get you eval copies of just about anything drop me an email. As for
Not sure what performance figures you are referring to (the ones that suck
I mean). To view the NSTL test results visit the TIS website at
http://www.tis.com/testing. To view University of Kansas test results
visit their website at
http://www.ittc.ukans.edu/projects/performance/gauntlet/.
And feel free to contact TIS directly for sales and evaluation copies.
I've got to believe someone working for the USAF has better things to do.
:-) They will even point you to customers who are serious about security
and are running Gauntlet firewalls under heavy loads.
Fred
Follow-Ups:
|
|