Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
From: Bill Stout <stoutb @ pios . com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 10:57:09 -0700
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

You might want to consider using PPTP, Net-net Tunnel servers, or
PC-Firewall Tunnel VPNs rather than opening a slew of ports for each new
service on your firewall.  The more you let through, the less of a firewall
it is.  Behind the tunnel use packet filtering to decide who gets to what
(security in layers).

As someone stated before, firewalls are good at filtering solicited
services, and not so good at filtering unsolicited services.  I submit that
for these new unsolicited services you have to fall back on strong
authentication & encryption rather than rely on a generic proxy.  Proxy
developers can't keep up with all new applications, since proxies
essentially are copies of that application running on a gateway
machine(i.e.; to proxy, to act for).

I believe the future of firewalls will be as a group of proxy servers, VPN
machines and secure application servers.  (Oh, here he goes with that farm
thing again...).  ;)

Bill Stout


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Gauntlet, VPN/WAN/Dialups
From: Christopher Michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
Next: RE: VPNs and PPTP
From: "Bowers T (Thomas) at MSXSSC" <TB186459 @ shellus . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: what ports to pass for exchange/outlook
From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ rc . on . ca>
Next: PPTP and STEELHEAD
From: Robert Ståhlbrand <robert . stahlbrand @ nmac . ericsson . se>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com